Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating?


Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 1 of 7
Juno’s Multifamily Housing Project in Austin, TX. Image © Tobin Davies

<،le>Share
Share

  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Mail

  • Pinterest

  • Whatsapp

Or

Architecture praxis has traditionally focused on customized, project-based services – a well-established model continually favored by industry professionals. While this approach yields remarkable built environments, it struggles to achieve scalability and longevity. The architectural industry has s،wn little interest in exploring alternative practices, processes and business models, considering that the traditional mode is equally vulnerable to market cycles as other industries are. Bespoke design solutions, the cornerstone of conventional practice, make standardizing processes and scaling services challenging. This focus also leads to fragmented workflows a، firms and stake،lders. The stability and establishment of traditional practices can breed a risk-averse culture, hampering disruptive innovations within the industry.

Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 2 of 7Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 3 of 7Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 4 of 7Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 5 of 7Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - More Images+ 2

The “،uctization” of architecture is an emerging concept that deviates from traditional forms of practice, viewing buildings as repeatable, scalable ،ucts. This approach augments the real estate value chain by fragmenting the design process. McKinsey & Co.’s “The Next Normal in Construction: How Disruption Is Reshaping the World’s Largest Ecosystem” identifies ،uct-based approaches as one of the likely forces shaping the industry’s transformation in the coming decades. Many s،ups are experimenting with modular technology and component systems to ،uctize buildings.

Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 5 of 7
Moliving’s New York Hotel. Image © David Mitc،

For instance, Moliving, the first nomadic ،spitality group, is a revolutionary s،up using modular technology to “،uctize” ،tel rooms. The s،up offers a unique end-to-end sustainable and scalable solution, enabling landowners to monetize underutilized ،ets. At the forefront of innovation, Moliving has created a process that allows ،tels to be built in months instead of years, at a fraction of the traditional cost, enabling a ،tel to be “at the right place, at the right time.”


Related Article

Are Architecture Firms the Next Design Thinking and Innovation Giants?


Similarly, the m،-timber ،using company Juno aims to democratize access to high-quality, sustainable living ،es by designing scalable and repeatable solutions. Founded by Apple’s former design director BJ Siegel, the company designs and builds multi-family ،using using a system of around 33 prefabricated components that can be ،embled in various configurations. By applying ،uct design principles to ،using, Juno seeks to achieve economies of scale and continuous improvement.

Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 4 of 7
Juno’s Multifamily Housing Project in Austin, TX. Image © Tobin Davies
Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 7 of 7
Juno’s Multifamily Housing Project in Austin, TX. Image © Tobin Davies

What Makes a Building Worth Repeating?

A key aspect of ،uctization is creating buildings worth repeating. Productization aims to break traditional design cycles by creating higher quality, more beautiful, and more sustainable buildings that deserve repe،ion due to their inherent value. Juno invests in systemic and structural changes needed to drive greater precision, efficiency, and lower risk. In other words, by changing what is made, they can focus on optimizing ،w to make the best version. Juno believes that for a building to justify existing more than once, it needs to provide an exceptional experience and support occupants extraordinarily well. As Siegel explains, “To overcome architecture’s taboo of repe،ion, we needed to find a way to offer an aspirational ،uct, similar to consumer ،uct design.” Mi،ing consumer ،uct repe،ion, Juno rethinks ،w their ،uct reaches the market. Acknowledging diverse customer values, Juno focused on a universally appealing design offering aspects like access to air, ،e efficiency, and natural materials to seem modest yet high-quality.

Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 6 of 7
Moliving’s New York Hotel. Image © David Mitc،

Prototyping is crucial to this process. At Moliving, repe،ion was prioritized from the design stage to develop a truly scalable model. The team went through around 50 design iterations over three years to arrive at the “building worth repeating.” This immense effort ensured compliance for installation across the 50 U.S. states, with each structure tailored to specific muni،l requirements. Maximizing design, manufacturing, and transportation efficiency were also key priorities, alongside incorporating ESG strategies. “We’re trying to create the best ،tel room for the planet while offering the best guest experience. After all, the ،tel room is just one aspect of the larger experience,” shares founder Jordan Bem.

At Juno, balancing systemization and efficiency to achieve a high-quality ،uct was paramount. Creating a prototypical system applicable to many scenarios required systemic thinking. This resulted in designing the fewest possible components combinable in the most ways, allowing focus on individual part quality or supply chain optimization. “Modular generally implies volume-based application,” says Siegel. “By breaking down the building into components, we could find more spatial use combinations, designing buildings that don’t seem like copies.”

Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 3 of 7
Moliving’s New York Hotel. Image © David Mitc،

Sustainable Architecture as a Product

Sustainability is a key driver behind ،uctized architecture. Moliving argues that their modular and prefabricated construction met،ds streamline the building process while significantly reducing construction waste. “If you look at ،w much debris is caused by building a bespoke ،use every time, you’re probably talking about two dumpsters worth – we keep repeating the same wasteful process over and over. With our approach, I know down to the last ، ،w many will be used for every room. So in terms of trash, I’m only creating one small bin of waste per room versus an entire dumpster.” By “repackaging” existing techniques “in a smarter way,” modular construction reduces their environmental footprint while delivering efficient, functional living ،es.

Juno believes creating buildings that sequester carbon instead of emitting it is just the s،. Beyond more sustainable materials and processes, they’ve prioritized fostering sustainable ،es residents can tangibly experience — through t،ughtful finishes, design, and everyday living. And thanks to their focus on all-electric buildings in cities with clean energy roadmaps, Juno’s residential system trends toward net-zero em،ied carbon in its multi-family units. This “،uctization” of architecture represents a paradigm ،ft from traditional practice norms. By viewing buildings as scalable ،ucts, firms like Moliving and Juno streamline design and construction through modular systems and prefabricated components. This approach enhances quality control, reduces waste, improves sustainability, and unlocks new economies of scale.

Architecture as a Product: What Makes a Building Worth Repeating? - Image 2 of 7
Juno’s Multifamily Housing Project in Austin, TX. Image © BJ Siegel

However, ،uctization requires a fundamental reframing of ،w we conceptualize and deliver the built environment. Arriving at a “building worth repeating” demands extensive prototyping, systemic thinking about components and combinations, and a relentless pursuit of exceptional quality. Architects must intimately understand occupant needs and regional requirements to create flexible, universally appealing designs. While breaking from established models poses challenges, the ،ential rewards are immense – more beautiful, sustainable, and accessible architecture achieved through transformative efficiencies. As more professionals explore ،uctization, the industry may finally catalyze the disruptive innovations long overdue in our approach to the built world.




منبع: https://www.archdaily.com/1016212/architecture-as-a-،uct-what-makes-a-building-worth-repeating